The Term Of Nakakainis In The Philippines English Language Essay

The Term Of Nakakainis In The Philippines English Language Essay Have you encountered a time when you are feeling really irritated or annoyed that you would just like to punch or slap a pesky person? When you are being disturbed by an utterly foolish person who asks nonsense questions? Or when you did not get to watch your favorite soap opera? These situations make you say NAKAKAINIS!!, right? But Filipino youth these days barely use the original meaning of nakakainis irritated, annoyed and troubled (Nakakainis in English, Yahoo Answers. June 2010). Filipino youth would say NAKAKAINIS if they find things which are interesting like after watching this video (Ayos sa Trip si Manong, You Tube . June 2010), seeing this very cute picture (Baby Cheeks, Flickr [picture file]. November 2005) or cracking Filipino funny jokes like Q: bakit bawal maligo ng sabay-sabay ang mga kalbo sa Jacuzzi? A: Kasi, magmu-mukha silang pinipritong squid ball!! They would say NAKAKAINIS!! even if they are not feeling irritated or annoyed. This is the NAKAKAINIS of our youth . We can also say that it is the modern nakakinis for the youth. NAKAKAINIS is a form of expression that is used by Filipino youth. They use it when they see interesting pictures, videos, mannerisms or stuffed toys. The word nakakainis has a prefix nakaka- and a root word inis. In Filipino, the prefix or unlaping naka- is used when the word will be used as a conjugate in the sentence. If the essay or sentence must be written in formal, the conjugate should be written having its prefix nakaka- first, and the root word itself. Example: nakakabaliw, nakakamatay, nakakagalit. If it is informal, the prefix naka- should be written fist, followed by the first syllable of the word, and the root word itself. Example: nakababaliw nakamamatay, nakagagalit. (Panlapi, Gintong Pamana: Aklat sa Wika 3. 2006) The word nakakainis has two different meanings the feeling of irritation or annoyance and the reaction of the showing of interest in a thing. Nakakainis, in English, means irritating or annoying. According to the definition of annoyance, if the feeling of irritations and annoyance mount up, our feeling outbursts and thus, the feeing of irritation and annoyance will be changed or result in anger or frustration.(Annoyance, Experience Festival. n.d.) It is an uncomfortable feeling that can be the reason of a sudden outburst of anger. Sometimes, if a person is really irritated or annoyed, he could not control his emotions and do something rush that would result to a big problem. People who doesnt have control in their feelings would shout or hurt the feelings of the person who irritates or annoys them. When we get angry because of irritation and annoyance, we should have presence of mind to prevent unwanted events to happen like fighting. The expression nakakainis, in a high-pitched tone, can mean the reaction after seeing interesting things. For example, a teenager sees you carrying a cute Crayola pillow and her reaction will surely be: Its so cute! Where did you buy that? Nakakainis! or I would also like to have one! Nakakainis ang pagka-cute nya! In my high school, my classmates used nakakainis as an expression whenever they find cute and interesting things. Making a person happy of satisfying a persons need is the same as pleasing them while annoyance or irritation is when somebody or something making you feel uneasy by continuously bothering you. Pleasing a person is not easy as annoying or irritating a person. We can contrast irritation or annoyance to pleasing a person. It takes time and effort to please somebody. Most of the time, people please others because they are scared of rejection. They are scared to be left alone and thus, making themselves always available even though they are busy. People-pleasers, those people who please others, feel that people are taking advantage of them because of their low self esteem. People-pleasers always suffer because of low esteem and they cant say no to people who ask them favors or requests. Ms. Carla Valencia stated in her blog that those people who like to please others are scared of people rejecting them, preventing problems between other people, problem on always degrading themselves beca use they are not confident enough on their abilities, skills or knowledge. (Low Self Esteem and Pleasing People, More Self Esteem. n.d.) Stress can be the result of being irritated and annoyed always. As stated earlier, being irritated or annoyed can lead to emotions such as anger and frustration. We all know that stress has a great effect in our lives. It makes us age prematurely, can lead us to have psychosomatic illness and greatly affect our job. Stress can be more of a factor in determining your physical age than the number of candles you blow out each year. (#7 Effects of Stress, About. November 2007) Because of stress, a person can look older than his present age. A good example for this one is the commercial from the StressTabs. In the commercial, Giselle Sanchez, the host of the bar, thought that a looking sick and old girl was already in her 50s so she called her as lola. Then the boyfriend of the girl told Giselle Sanchez that she is his girlfriend and she looks like that because she is stressed and tired from work. But the girl, after taking StressTabs, looked like she transformed into a pretty, fine, youn g-looking girl. This commercial is telling us that being stress always would ruin our beautiful face and will only look older. According to the number five of the effects of stress, it is stated that thinking negative things and being emotionally stressed results in psychosomatic illness. We should be worrying about it because it can be treated like in any other kind of sickness. (#5 Effects of Stress, About. November 2007) People can cure themselves by attending Yoga classes. By doing Yoga, stress will go away and it can refrain us from getting or acquiring psychosomatic illnesses. People should always think positive things to also prevent from being stressed and sick. We, people, need to have energy to work. But, if we are always stressed, we cant do our job well. People need to rest to have energy. The Filipino expression kakagigil or a intense emotion, urge or feeling that a person gets over with something that he/she thinks is totally wonderful and together describes carefully how a person responds or want to respond (Getting Gigil with It, Culture Fried. March 2010), can be compared to kakainis. NAKAKAINIS is a form of expression that is used by Filipino youth. They use it when they see interesting pictures, videos, mannerisms or stuffed toys. The expressions that we daily use reflects on our attitudes. Most expressions are slang and vulgar words. We should be wary of people because they will base their first impressions on other people by just hearing their expressions. Especially here in the Philippines, most expressions used are curses, slang and other vulgar words. We should be careful in every word we say. Expressions are like any other words we encounter. As we all know, words are dynamic. Thus, the expressions we daily use could also evolve its meaning in years to come.

My writing styles Essay -- Essays Papers

My writing styles There are many writing styles that many people pick up as they go through there many years of schooling. Each person picks up the same type of writing styles but as years go by people seem to pick up there own little types of writing style that separates them from everyone else. As I have gone through many years of English classes I have acquired more and more skills and many more are sure to come as I continue my education. My writing skills have only gotten better from the time of ninth grade English class until today. Since my days back in junior high school I was only taught the basic skills to write papers and since then they have grown to make me a decent writer. I have many strengths and also many weakness that I still need to work on. Many people have there own strengths in writing and there own weaknesses that they need to work on. I consider myself a half way decent writer because I have a couple of weakness that I still need to work on for me to be the writer that I want to be. One of my major weaknesses in my writing ...

Moksha and Salvation

Since the fall of man and the manifestation of sin, a wedge was placed between God and man. Man has strived to establish a reconnection with God through a variety of sources. Salvation is the source or bridge that connects man to God. Every religion has its own philosophy concerning the path of salvation. â€Å"The goal of most Indian religions is to break the cycle of karma and samsara and be free from the burden of life. This breaking of life is called Moksha† (Hopfe & Woodard, 2009, [pg. 85]). Moksha is the Hindu term used which liberates the soul from karma . This liberation can be experienced through death or while one is yet living. In observing the Hindu concept of salvation in comparison to Christianity, there are some similarities as well as differences. It is the Hindu belief that salvation, referred to as Moksha â€Å"can be obtained through three paths: knowledge (inana), devotion (bhakti), ritual works or karma† (McDowell & Stewart, 2006). These are the three concepts that illustrate the differences and similarities in both religions of how salvation can be attained. In observing the similarities, the first similarity is the theory that salvation can be attained through knowledge. This type of knowledge is spiritual. In Hinduism it is believed that â€Å"Humans basic problem is not wickedness but ignorance. People are ignorant about the true nature of reality and believe that they are separated from Brahman† (Hope& Woodard, 2009, [pg. 105]). In the Hindu society, it is only when Moksha is obtained that one is able to see life from a clear perspective. According to Upanishads, â€Å"When true knowledge of the illusion of life is realized, one can be freed from the bondage of life and achieve unity with Brahman† (Hope& Woodard, 2009, [pg. 89]). In contrast, in Christianity Satan is referred to as a liar and a deceiver. It is his duty to distort the minds of God’s children and cause them to lose focus of their divine purpose on the earth. He creates the illusion that that there is no Hell and neither is there a God. Thus, many of God’s people continue to live destructive lifestyles as if they will live forever. The second similarity that both Christianity and Hinduism share is the belief that its liberation cannot be found in earthly things. Believers of both religions are challenged to disregard earthly things and esteem heavenly things. In a world that is so full of hate, suffering, misfortune and tragedy; people are on desperately searching to fill some type of void. From a Hindu perspective, â€Å"Humans do not recognize the Brahman but instead try to cling to the objects of life-which are like mirages-they keep slipping away from our grasp† (Hopfe &Woodard, 2009, [pg. 05]. Many Christians find themselves plagued with the same problem; they begin to chase after the things of the world rather than the things of God. Concerning material things Griffiths states, â€Å"There are four ends of life, pleasure (kama), wealth (artha), duty (dharma) and liberation. The modern world recognized the first three but has lost sight of the last, yet without this goal of final liberation, of ultimate transcendence, all the other goals lead to frustration. †¦. (Griffiths, 1982, pg. [66]). It is only when one comes to the realization that the world and all it has to offer is temporary, and can’t bring true fulfillment; will they then center their priorities on things eternal. Though the similarities of salvation are quite similar, when comparing both religions; there are also some major differences. One of the major differences between how both religions perceive salvation is that Hinduism teaches that salvation must be earned. The theory â€Å"what goes around, comes around is what the religion is centered around. Through karma, or doing good things; one can either gain salvation or escape reincarnation. However, Christianity teaches that all of our works are just like filthy rags. In Christianity it is taught that salvation is given through grace. Ephesians 2: 8-9 says, â€Å"For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith-and not this from yourselves, it is the gift of God- not by works, so that no one can boast† (NIV, 2007, Ephesians 2:8-9). The most profound difference is that that Hinduism recognizes no single path to gaining salvation As stated previously, â€Å"Moksha can be obtained through three paths: knowledge (inana), devotion (bhakti), ritual works or karma (McDowell & Stewart, 2006). Another method of attaining freedom is through the exercise of Yoga. Through various Yoga exercises one seeks to connect with Brahman. In contrast, the path to salvation in Christianity requires one simple confession; this confession is found in Romans 10:9: â€Å"That if you confess ith your mouth â€Å"Jesus is Lord† and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved† (NIV, 2007, Romans 10:9). Jesus Christ is the way to salvation none can attain it any other way, for He said, â€Å"I am the way, the truth and the life†¦Ã¢â‚¬  (NIV, 2007, John 14:6). In summary, the path to salvation is sought in various ways through both Hinduism and Christianity. Each individual in these religio ns are in search for something that they realize the world can’t offer. It is only when one understands this simple concept that the path to freedom begins.

The, The Greatest Good For Greatest Number - 1354 Words

The scenario I want to discuss about is whether a Utilitarian would be with or against torture in the given scenario. If a terrorist planted a bomb in a mall, and in order to save the people within it was to torture the innocent terrorist’s daughter, would the terrorist be with or against torturing one to save thousands? Personally with what great knowledge I’ve obtained in class I can automatically say that a Utilitarian would be for torturing the daughter because it’s all about maximizing utility. With that being said A Philosopher by the name of Joshua Green found out just that. Joshua Greene basically argued in his piece â€Å"Moral Tribes† for of which what the â€Å"Father of Utilitarianism†, Bentham, states. Bentham said â€Å"The Greatest good†¦show more content†¦So initially with the innocent daughter of the terrorist, it isn’t about the daughter’s life. It’s bigger than just her; it’s the thousands within the mall. So Bentham of which would be for torture. According to an online dictionary, said by the work of an Italian Philosopher Cesare Beccaria; Bentham formed a belief towards his views about torture. He in certain cases according to the web believed that torture could be justified. Meaning in some cases it can give better results than if not taking in account, removes problems immediately if you may With the use of Hedonic Calculus we can calculate the sum total of pleasure and pain produced from a particular act, thus the total value of its consequences. The units of pleasure are known as hedons, when we run our possible outcomes, the actions that yield the most hedons are the morally good actions. This turns morality into one big cost-benefit analysis. When choosing what action is right we consider the pleasures and pains resulting from it. In other words we look at the extent, intensity and duration. By intensity we mean how intense is the pleasure or pain? According to philosophy Lander Educational site, Bentham apparently thought intensity would vary from zero to infinity. By duration we mean how long does the pleasure of pain last? Also by Extent Bentham meant the total amount of utility or pleasure can be had by summing a similar calculation for every other person who is affected